Who isn't better than Mark Redman, you may ask? Well, I went over that already, genius. But these are some people you may not remember or you may wish you could forget that I would rather have back in Atlanta than Redman.
Pete Smith was horrible except for one 12 game stint in 1992 with the Braves when he went 7-0 and subsequently was part of a poster called Five Ace's with newly acquired Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, John Smoltz, and Steve Avery. But this guy was horrible. 47-71, a 4.55 career ERA when the league ERA was 3.90 when he played, and two seasons with more than a hundred K's. But hey, I'll take him over Redman if he wanted to come back. He's only 40 and since he has not pitched in the majors since 1998, you know he is well rested.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65682/656824170a9a9d3beb253951f64912e4fcf9aa14" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab198/ab19842bf7e6f1aff722e525f609daabe93afe4f" alt=""
Speaking of people who are not busy, Shane Reynolds would be welcomed back. Granted, unlike some of these guys, he actually had a decent career until injuries took away his fastball, but I will still take the shell of his former self over the Indian. This is especially hard to say as I watched him take Jason Marquis's spot in 2003 without much reason. He kept getting start after start, sucking day after day, and somehow, he was 11-9. Do you still wonder why pitcher's win-loss records are worth about as much as my picture of that old guy down the street yelling at me to get off his lawn.
Right now, I will take Kevin Grysboski back. That's how desperate I am.
You know what we need? We need to get Reggie Jackson to think Mark Redman is the Queen and try to kill him. Everybody wins.
No comments:
Post a Comment